The Wake Up Call That Came to Late- Look at the Background Smiling Faces




D9R IDF Solution to its Gaza Problem – Bulldoze it into the Mediterranean



Daguerreotypes : Haunting, Beautiful, and Storied Pictures in the Early Photography Collection of Rod MacKenzie


Daguerreotypes Part I: Haunting, Beautiful, and Storied Pictures in the Early Photography Collection of Rod MacKenzie

daguerreotype hunters

Lot 113: Half Plate Daguerreotype Portrait of Two Hunters with Game and Sleeping Dog, Est. $1,500-2,500

Daguerreotypes are a reminder of a time when photography was very different from the “point-and-shoot” instant pictures of today. Now, you carry a camera in the cell phone in your back pocket everywhere you go. Then, as now, photographers were purveyors of state-of-the-art technology.

In fact, the 19th century photographers who made these long-exposure images were referred to as daguerrean artists, and quickly supplanted the portrait painters of the day. The artists’ “images,” particularly daguerreotypes, were valued for their clarity and honesty in representation.

Other than the careful arrangement of a composition, the daguerrean photographer almost never altered an image in any way, except for portraits with pink-tinted cheeks, or gold-highlighted jewelry and buttons.

ambrotype lot 103

Lot 103: Ninth Plate Ambrotype Portrait of Man Pouring a Milk Can, Est. $100-150

Daguerrean artists did, however, use interesting means to achieve compositional effects that would otherwise be limited by long exposure times. In the ambrotype pictured here, depicting a man pouring milk from a pitcher, the “milk” is actually a white cloth.

The long exposure times needed for daguerreotypes and other forms of early photography also cause families, soldiers, children, and laborers to look out from stiff, unsmiling poses. It could be a long and strenuous task to sit for one of these images.  Yet, if you look closely, the lives and loves of the subjects become clear, and the 19th century doesn’t feel quite so distant.

On October 30, 2011, the American Furniture & Decorative Arts auction will open with 150 lots of daguerreotypes, ambrotypes and tintypes from the Early Photography collection of Rod MacKenzie.

As a collector, Rod MacKenzie has a sophisticated taste for images that speak to him – and now to us – emotionally, historically, and artistically. He understands well the limitations of early photography, and carefully collects images which, though mainly portraits, show us more than just what the sitter looked like.


Lot 17: Sixth Plate Ambrotype of a Boy with His Drum, Est. $600-800

There are signs of life throughout the images in his collection – children holding toys close, workmen demonstrating tools of their trade, and soldiers exuding confidence and swagger.

In addition to the portraits, MacKenzie collects images that tell stories. Among the best of these is a set of so-called “occupationals.” There are dozens of images that convey a strong sense of narrative: portraits of beautiful, elegantly dressed women give us a window into the day’s style; prosperous young couples exude airs of optimism; and men show their skill at their daily occupations. This group includes some of the rarest examples  MacKenzie  gathered: an architect seen in his office at a desk with his drafting tools and elevation drawings of Italianate houses on the walls behind him, a blacksmith at his anvil, a mailman, farmers, a banjo player, a string quartet, a bugle player, carpenters, buggy drivers, and firemen.

In Part II of this series, we’ll take a look at some of the highlights of this truly astounding collection. Every time I turn a page in the catalogue, I seem to find something new in one of these images that I hadn’t seen before. Which images speak most strongly to you?

On October 30, 2011, Skinner will offer the first part of the Early Photography collection of Rod MacKenzie in our American Furniture & Decorative Arts auction. Read Part I of this series to learn more about Rod MacKenzie’s sophisticated taste as a collector.

MacKenzie’s extensive knowledge of American history, particularly of the Civil War, is represented by dozens of extraordinary images of military officers and soldiers. The collection includes portraits of soldiers of all types:  officers, dashing men in uniform, and heart-breaking images of very young men headed off to war. In looking at these images, we feel tantalizingly close to the battlefield and to the figures taking part in military history. Notes tucked behind case liners, such as “taken at Newbern, No. Carolina 1863 WLW Private C. E. 44th Mass,” bring us in even closer.

Another focus of the collection is photography of children being children in ways we aren’t used to seeing in 19th century photographs. One highlight is an image of a class of thirty children attending “Petersham School in Miss Laura’s Day.” We must credit the photographer for keeping the kids still during the exposure, though perhaps more of the credit is due to Miss Laura herself.

Rod found a pair of photographs showing a sweet-faced boy and a girl, probably twins, seated in the same stencil-decorated chair. He has an image of a girl holding a chalkware cat, and another of a boy with his paint-decorated drum – both subjects hold their cherished possessions close.


Lot 23: Two Sixth Plate Daguerreotype Portraits of A Boy and a Girl, probably twins, Est. $300-500

Rod made an effort to collect images of leisure activity, too, giving us even more opportunity to peer through a window into the 19th century. There’s an image of two men playing checkers housed in a Union case appropriately called “The Chess Players.” An ambrotype of four men, one wearing a military cap, holding mugs of beer, allows us to view a moment of revelry. A half-plate daguerreotype of hunters posing with game and their hunting dog represents the type of artistic composition that daguerrians often practiced. In another, a gentleman hunter with a stovepipe hat and a frock coat poses with his long gun against a painted backdrop representing a rural landscape, all housed in a case called “The Hunter.”


Lot 137: Half Plate Ambrotype Depicting a Whitehall, New York, Street Parade with Band, Est. $800-1,200

City- and townscapes, another category in the collection, are represented by some rare early photographs of mid-19th century houses including a gothic cottage, a Greek revival farmhouse, and a three-story Federal mansion. Perhaps rarest of that group is an image showing a street parade in Whitehall, New York.

Many of these sometimes haunting photographs are housed in rare thermoplastic or “Union” cases, each collectible in their own right for their unique designs. To create these cases, a specific mix of shellac, pulverized wood fibers and dyes would be heated to create a thick plastic liquid. That semi-solid was rolled out into a sheet, then individually pressed into any one of dozens of patterns which hardened when cooled. Half-plate examples of these thermoplastic cases in the collection are titled “Washington Monument, Richmond, Virginia,” “American Country Life – Summer Evening,” and “The Wedding Procession.” Others show firefighters, military trophies, and more.

In all of Skinner’s years in the business, we’ve crossed paths with and offered hundreds of early photographs. Rarely have those images equaled the quality and beauty of the pictures Rod found, or given us such insight into the people they show.


Love And Marriage? 25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism


Love And Marriage? 25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism


Yeah, I can open it. WHEN I BREAK IT ON YOUR SKULL.

The first thing I feel when I look at these atrocious ads is grateful.  Grateful that we are where we are now.  Grateful that my daughter is growing up in a world where women are increasingly seen as equal to men.  Granted, women still earn something like 75 cents for every dollar a man makes.  There is a gender-related wage gap in virtually every occupational category.

And still…

Take a look at the 25 advertisements below and you might also feel grateful to those who went before who beat bloodied hands on glass ceilings to pave the way for us, our daughters and their daughters.

Wives and mothers from sixties and before had it particularly bad.  They were prisoners of society’s expectations.  How could they ever truly know who they were if they had to conform to what was deemed appropriate feminine behavior?

Thank God I came of age in the age of “You can be anything you want to be” movement.  I know sexism and gender inequality is alive and well, but when I look at my daughter the possibilities seem endless.  Especially compared to the little girls who grew up seeing advertisements like the ones featured below.  Some are so horrible it’s tough to believe they’re real.  But they are.

25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

The Little Lady Belongs In The Kitchen

Tell that to my husband, the chef and cook in this household. Photo credit:

25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

An Ad For Rugs? Pants? Domestic Abuse?

Seriously, how did this pass Don Draper’s desk? Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Coffee Approved Domestic Violence

Woe be unto you ladies who aren’t “store-testing” coffee freshness. Go on fellas. Beat the hell out of her! Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

I’m Just A Secretary, I Don’t Know Much About Computers

Good thing she’s got sexy legs! Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Ketchup For The Delicate Woman

Yeah I can open it. WHEN I CRACK IT ON YOUR SKULL. Don’t you love how they underline the word “woman”? Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Being Pretty Is So Much Better Than Being Smart

25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

It’s Your Fault He’s Not Coming Home, You Ugly Broad

Take the time to read the text on this one… Pretty mind-blowing. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

We All Know Women Can’t Drive

I can drive a stick and my husband can’t, suckas! Also, is that Goldie Hawn? Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

The Harder She Works The Cuter She Looks

This is probably some form of speed to keep the little woman working nonstop. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Lysol Feminine Products Can Save Your Marriage

“Often a wife fails to realize that doubts due to one intimate neglect shut her out from happy married love”. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Men Are Better Than Woman

Another mind-blower. Don’t beat around the bush, Drummond, tell us how you really feel. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Someone’s Blowing Smoke All Right…

I know I turn into absolute mush when a man blows smoke in my face. I put out EVERY time! Photo
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Indelicate Women Are Hideous!

Society (men) simply WON’T stand for it, ladies! I haven’t put on deodorant yet today… and I’d love to get the dude behind this ad in a sweaty headlock. HOW DO YOU LIKE ME NOW? HUH? THAT INDELICATE ENOUGH FOR YA? Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

All I Want For Christmas Is A… Toaster?

You can take your kitchen appliances and shove it, mister. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Keep Her Where She Belongs

You know… naked, on the floor, kissing your feet? That’s where women belong. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

When In Doubt, Throw A Chick In A Bikini

Dear God, I can’t even count the things wrong with this ad, which is uncomfortably current. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Yes! She’s Decidedly To Blame!

I love how the ad for feminine hygiene is marketed toward men. Like, women are so low on the totem pole ad execs won’t even market feminine hygiene products toward them. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Housework + Appearance = A Woman’s Role

Sure you clean the house all day, BUT ARE YOU THIN ENOUGH? Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

You Know You’re The Woman Your Husband Wants You To Be

“Every husband wants his wife to be feminine in every sense of the word”. Notice how the word husband is the biggest and boldest? Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

The Perfect Perpetuation of Gender Stereotypes

She’s cleaning and breaking nails. He just likes big, cool, machinery. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Here Comes The Old Battle Axe Again, Son

Use Ivory Soap to calm your nerves and for hellsakes, stop ruining evenings for your family! Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Thank Goodness For Men Penmakers!

In case you can’t read what’s in parenthesis there it says “And it’s time the men who make pens did something about it.” Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

A Woman’s Place Is In The Kitchen

Isn’t he hilarious! Making light of how his wife can’t even cook right. And it’s her only job! Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

All Women Want…

I’d love to show you my reaction if my husband rolled up on Christmas morning with a new vacuum for me. Photo credit:
25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism

Women Can’t Drive

I hope that crumpled bumper means she ran over her husband for getting her a vacuum for Christmas. Photo

You May Also Like

Dia De Los Muertos: Families Celebrate Day of the Dead

Hilarious! Halloween or Williamsburg? Photos That Will Leave You Howling

All photos courtesy of:


15 amazing birth photos from the delivery room
10 things you should NEVER say to your daughter-in-law

The 10 most useless baby products

20 most ridiculous mother and baby products…EVER

The 7 worst things you can say to your child

  • Share


  • Tweet


  • 19

  • 257

  • 103

You May Also Like


Read More

« Go Back To MOM

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, profile photo and other personal information you make public on Facebook (e.g., school, work, current city, age) will appear with your comment. Comments, together with personal information accompanying them, may be used on and other Babble media platforms. Learn More.

103 thoughts on “Love And Marriage? 25 Vintage Ads Depicting Blatant Sexism”

  1. GreenInOC says:

    I “think” the intent of the Goldie Hawn or Goldie Hawn look-alike one is based on her dumb/simpleton blonde Laugh In characterization that she was well known for and perhaps maybe not so much a “women are idiots” message.

  2. Barb says:

    Ugh! Most of those are horrid! Thankfully, they’re a thing of the past. Unfortunately, we haven’t moved beyond the attitudes in some of them.

    The Total one, I get. They’re saying the cereal will give her the energy she needs to keep up with her housekeeping. I don’t really find that too offensive and think it’s a bit tame compared to some of today’s weight loss ads which are just focused on being thin. Heck, we all still have housekeeping to do, no matter what glass ceilings have been shattered. I’ve blogged about fatigue issues getting in the way of housework. It’s a real problem for some.

    And, I wouldn’t mind a vacuum for Christmas, but that’s just me – lol. I’m all about the practical gifts and not getting something that’s going to be useless clutter. :)

  3. NashPam says:

    Wow, a douche with Lysol?

  4. LS says:

    @Nashpam – Ha! I thought the same thing!

  5. Heather says:

    Calm down ladies. I’m purposely not checking his coffee for store freshness, because seriously that spanking looks like fun.

  6. Anna says:

    They are horrid, but they are not all a thing of the past. Has anyone seen the latest Dr. Pepper 10 campaign? The tagline is “Not for women!” and it is straight from the 1930s playbook. Here’s an article about it. I stopped buying all Dr. Pepper products as my way of letting them know they are totally out of touch.

  7. TwinHappyJen says:

    How many fingers does that one lady have?? :-p

  8. These are hilarious (in a totally disturbing, I can’t believe people actually would print that dribble kinda way). Thanks for posting. I needed a little amusement in my day.

  9. Suzie says:

    yeah the spanking is hot and the blowing in your face, too…double entendrés much? anyway, the “automatic” thing is laughable because I drive stick and my husband CANT

  10. Nadia says:

    hahah wow those are bad! I love how the on the self cleaning ad, the women says she broke 14 fingernails. Do they think women can’t count how many fingers they have? My goodness.

  11. Monica Bielanko says:

    @Suzie – Me too! I’m going to add that line to the post!

  12. Kate1202 says:

    I love the Schlitz one (didn’t burn the beer)! I want to frame it and put it in my kitchen. I’ve made some pretty egregious cooking mistakes, where the only redeeming part of the meal has been the accompanying glass of wine :)

  13. Mergath says:

    I have to admit, I did giggle a little at the “you didn’t burn the beer” ad.

  14. Laura Brown says:

    That douche advert is hilarious. “Ladies! Is YOUR vagina feminine enough?”

  15. LN says:

    Is it wrong that i found these hysterical (& offensive, but mostly hysterical)? Thanks for sharing these!:-D

  16. Meghan says:

    I can’t seem to be able to click through to read the fine print. Am I missing the links?

  17. The Gentle Mom says:

    Wow, those are hysterical, in a horrifying kind of way.

  18. Belinda says:

    These were great to laugh at…and cry at lol. How about that yellow bikini, wow any higher cut and it would be stuck under her armpits. Wonder if it comes in any other colours…..

  19. Tina says:

    This post cracks me up. Granted it’s super disturbing they are in fact from our past but I’d say most women have a good sense of humor now days. Love love love the schlitz beer one, though I too would be okay with burnt dinner as long as there was still beer.

  20. T says:

    So THAT’S where doucheing and the vagina monologues came from. Stinky balled men who didn’t like the natural smell of a woman. Your hubby will leave you if your vagina smells like a vagina and not a field of roses… This post made me sick… in a good way.

  21. Susie says:

    I love how the woman in the Hoover ad has an empty thought bubble over her head. “Husbands, your wife doesn’t know what she wants until YOU tell her — get her a Hoover!”

  22. T Dog says:

    I’ll bet you can find current day ads that are almost as insulting and I don’t mean in a girlie magazine. Some just seem like they are aimed at women.

  23. Heather says:

    So many things to say but one thing that sticks out to me is Lysol feminine products. Lysol? really?!? Lol yikes!

  24. Diana says:

    Like ads were not offensive to men , children , the elderly and animals of both sexes back then and now? Heck homer simpson, Bart simpson , grampa simpson and the simpson’s pet dog certainly do not paint males in general in a grand light now do they? Nor do other adds and television programs for the rest of the population , those adds above are not only insulting to women they are insulting to men as well as if a man in general thinks like that? My hubs sure as hell would be insulted if he were depicted in that light as a wife beater, who can’t do his own shopping, cooking and cleaning yet expects his supposed mindless wife too lol he would boycott those products in a heart beat. advertising and views like this have been around since the dawn of organized written civilization written in our very religious and law texts yet nothing has changed except how we word it and depict it along with the current mindset of the times . In Shakespeare’s A Winter’s Tale, Autolycus sings: “Come, buy of me; come buy, come buy, buy, lads, or else your lasses cry.” so how better to advertise without insulting everyone? Now that would be far more interesting to see because no matter what you do someone will feel jilted.

  25. Alan says:

    I’m not sure whats wrong here. Doesn’t everyone physically abuse their wife when the coffee isn’t as fresh as it could be?

  26. Adrienne says:

    As a young female, these ads depress me. Not because I find them horrible, but because it makes me pine for simpler times. Some women still live to please their husbands, I know I do.

    1. Jack says:

      Bravo! One who still believes in being a good woman and wife out of conviction. Your husband is fortunate to have you!

  27. Diana says:

    And there are a lot of adds insulting to people with physical and mental disability’s and debilitating conditions and different skin tones, after all what paraplegic can climb a mountain after eating a health food bar? And how many time’s have you heard so easy a child can do it yet you know someone with the mind of an infant due to an accident or birth defect who is taken care of? Or here’s one use this pearl face powder to give you a healthy peachy glow yet the add is in ebony magazine XD So do we make things that everyone can use or do we market for specific demographic’s insulting and leaving out the rest ? Yes those adds above are insulting but not just to women yet i still find the humor in them .

  28. watermoon says:

    I couldn’t read most of the images either, and for the one that suggested the wordy body was most important, I tried to save the image in case the site just shrunk it down too much, the image itself is tiny sized and unreadable.

    Oh well. Still, I’m in agreance that most of these are no worse than the ones out there today. (The Milk Council’s PMS, Toyota’s minivan, most truck ads, and Dr. Pepper’s new product come to mind, and don’t EVEN get me started on the diet pills…)

    Anybody remember the Virgina Slim’s “you’ve come a long way, baby?” ads? Yes, now you too can kill yourself and those around you in public!

  29. Linda, t.o.o. says:

    LMAO @ “intimate neglect.”

  30. Ipo Vogel says:

    Feminist idiot writing a stupid article. Found this via Yahoo, and figured I’d see some funny ads. Have a laugh at how things have changed, not see a full blown bulldike lesbian convention freaking out over some old ads. Sexism is still out there, yes, but it’s dying and taking on a new form, one in which men are discriminated against. Spousal abuse and divorce court come to mind immediately, my own father was terrified of getting a divorce because he was afraid he’d lose all his kids no matter what they said about wanting to live with him. So, Ms. Article Lady… Would you like some cheese with your whine?

    All this from a female Native American (yes, that would be the smallest “minority” in the world). Have a nice day.

  31. Manjari says:

    What is going on in the ad with the man stepping on the head of the woman/rug thing. I can’t read it. What is that advertising.

  32. Manjari says:

    I left off the question mark.

  33. The Raven says:

    Babble editors must not think Ipo Vogel is a very disgruntled, sexist, prejudiced, very ignorant and hostile, very poor example of a Native American ANYTHING! I am shamed if her claim to my ancestry is true, and apologize for her unseemly ignorant vomiting. Thrown out of her own tribe no doubt for the shame she causes.

    My birth name: Raven

    My coming of age name : Silvercat

    My spirit Guide : The Florida panther and …

    My Tribe : Nez Pierce

    Ya -teh-hey

  34. FRED says:

    Some of these are just ridiculous, especially the “A girl-sized hand needs a girl-sized pen” ad. Who screwed up and let her out of the kitchen long enough to learn how to write, anyway? (Sorry ladies… I couldn’t resist.)

    It’s definitely a good thing that ads aren’t generally like this anymore, but over the past decade or so, I’ve noticed things swinging the opposite way, though not as much in print ads as in television commercials. There are tons of commercials that portray men either as clueless simpletons who have no idea what goes on around them and need to be told what to do, what to buy, etc., by their wives.

    My least favorite in recent history is the Sears ad for central air conditioning systems, where the woman say something like “It’s going to be a scorcher. You should call Sears and get a new central air system.” He’s sitting there reading the newspaper, probably attempting to enjoy his last few minutes of relaxation before heading to work, and says “Ok, I’ll call tomorrow.” She leans over, hands him a phone, and says, “You’ll call NOW!” Thus ends the commercial, but he should have told her “Excuse me? Are your fingers broken? If you’re in that big a freaking hurry, pull out *your* credit card, make the call, and leave me alone.”

    No, that’s no worse than some of the print ads above, but the point is, we feel your pain, ladies. I wish advertisers didn’t feel the need to belittle either gender, but as long as advertisers think it helps to sell products, they will.

  35. Kirkury says:

    Funny thing… When these ads were used the US seemed to have a more integral ethic, national pride and family value. WOW all before “sexism” was put to an end, and women were allowed to exploit their goods.

    Gimme a break. Things should go back in this direction, We’d se no more Kardouchians and Paris Whoreltons or Lindsey Lowlifes.

  36. Trish says:

    Thank God I came of age in the “You can laugh at anything you want” age. These ads are first and foremost highly entertaining. They are funny because they are wrong. It’s how we were and we’ve evolved since then, okay? Getting all high and mighty about things one cannot change is silly. I grew up seeing all those ads, and more, and I turned out fine. I knew they were wrong then, just as I know it now. You talk about sexism and gender inequality, but you don’t want to give us any credit for having the brains to evaluate them for ourselves.

  37. Aja @microwavelove says:

    Wow! I would liked to have seen the year’s that these were created. I think the sad part is that while we’ve come far, we haven’t come as far as we think we have in advertising. (Anyone seen a Go-Daddy or Axe commercial lately?)

    Sidebar: Nothing would make me happier than receiving a Hoover for Christmas this year. Seriously. I asked for one.

  38. BWT123 says:

    Ok, so now we have Victoria’s Secret ads where women(girls) prance with their boobs pushed up so far that choking is a real threat. Yes, they are beautiful, and yes, I am sure they are paid well. But the real secret there is that fake boobs sell.

  39. chas says:

    omg this is hilarious.

  40. Susan (5 Minutes for Mom) says:

    Insane and outrageous.

  41. Aimeesmom says:

    Seriously?! People are still getting upset about this??? Yes, the current day ones can be a little frustrating. But we can’t change what was printed over 50 years ago! Get over it! It doesn’t do any good to keep bringing it up! The one about losing weight while cleaning? Sounds good to me! I am a housewife and I do clean and losing weight sounds great!

  42. Billie says:

    These made me laugh. And yes, there are ads out there that put men down too. The Carl Jr.s ad about how if it wasn’t for them some men would starve drives my husband crazy, he hates it so much. Again, I just laugh :)

  43. Macie says:

    Having grown up during this time period, I am very familiar with the “women are stupid” mentality: they just don’t know how to drive, etc. I sat in my room and listened to the men at cocktail parties making jokes about it and the women laughing right along with them. I learned how to manipulate men by saying, “Well, I just can’t do this…can you help me?” But it is hard to understand, with things changing so quickly these days, that some of the women at that time had had mothers or grandmothers who remembered not having the right to vote! I also remember rebelling against all this when I was passed up for opportunities in school because I was a girl and became a very angry teenager in the 60′s…just in time for the women’s lib movement and everything else that was going on.

  44. Macie says:

    But having also cleaned and waxed the linoleum and hardwood floors in my floors on my hands and knees with my mom, we were thrilled when Dad came home with a floor polisher. We also the first family in the neighborhood to have a dishwasher because mom and I got tired of boiling my baby brother’s glass bottles and nipples in hot water, as prescribed in those days, so she was able to sterilize them in the dishwasher while also (yay) saving us all from having to wash and dry all those dishes. (Yes, Dad participated.) And need I mention not having to hang the clothes outside on the line? Or having the clothes come out soft and warm and a few of them not needing ironing? I still needed to sprinkle all the clothes with a Coke bottle with a corked special sprinkler cap, roll them up to get nice and damp, spray them with spray starch (another time-saving invention) and spend hours ironing while watching Ethel and Lucy play dumb on I Love Lucy on our new black and white TV! (No permanent press in those days. But I was so proud that Dad was the second dad in the neighborhood to buy us one! Electric mixers, pop-up toasters…all those things were wonderful! And just as exciting to buy as are all the new appliances we buy today! Have you seen the current ads for the Frigidaire or the newest washers and dryers?

  45. Macie says:

    Last one:

    BTW: Sex is not only used in advertising today, but in many high fashion ads women are depicted as INVITING abuse! What are all the torn-up clothes about…half ripped off the body as if a woman has just been raped. And have you listened to current music lately? Or watched an R-rated film or late night TV? Violent sexual abuse of women is glorified! Today I’m angry about that! Let’s face it…much has changed, but not in every case for the better. And, yes, Goldie Hawn was playing the part of a “dumb blonde” who danced on SNL, so in that case, blondes should be upset, which I’m not, so…’nuf said!

  46. SliverLady says:

    There was something to the lysol douching. a family member was told that for birth control prevention. Her sister told her to cease and desist and the next month she was pregnant. so almost two years of great bc then poof

  47. Mod says:

    Macie, thanks for perpetuating rape culture. Men have control over themselves, and they decide to rape people. Clothes don’t make people rape. Do some serious reading.

    Also, most men, and some women, consider breasts sex objects, when they are not. They are erogenous zones in both sexes. Yet women have to legally keep them covered when boys and men don’t, thus “indecent” (legal term) body part is hidden from view, and only legally allowed to be shown if someone is working in an adult establishment.

    When a woman can’t walk down the street without a top on but a man can, in America, this is very sad, and sadder still that people still think that would invite rape, or that she is crazy. They are the same parts. Literally. Scientifically. Sex object? I could care less about mine during sex. Almost 100% of my life, breasts are the same as a mans – doing nothing. I do not have kids. They are not FOR anything, until they are being used….yet as a woman, I can’t show mine? I basically live in the Middle East. And the US government, allows states to decide for themselves, when it should be a basic human right to not be discriminated against based on sex or gender. And yet it continues.

    I am disgusted with America. The message to girls is clear: you are not equal. You cannot do the same as a boy, and your breasts make you a sexual object.

    Wow. People need to see the light. When you are mad that your girlfriend, mom, or friend is raped, realize that by not allowing the same rights to women, you help men and women everywhere perpetuate rape culture, by allowing people to objectify and hide women’s breasts, thus making them (and the owner) indecent. Did you know that women who show their breasts, even if they barely have any, (meanwhile a fat man can have DD breasts showing) and she is registered as a sex offender in most places in America? Seriously.

    Discrimination is still here. Legally.

  48. Molly says:

    I’m still trying to figure out that oven cleaning one. I only have 10 she cleaning the oven with her feet also tha she can break 14 nails?

  49. Mean Gene says:

    By the way thats not a crumpled bumper. Thats a fender. Now,, get back to the kitchen and make me a sammich!

  50. DKJ says:

    Some fairly extreme reactions posted here. Yes, these are a bit sad and, in our current time, silly as all heck. I could not read many of them to even figure out compelte what was being advertised. I’m just glad I don’t have to look at such junk these days. And I wish many of current-day ads were also not being shown as many are still rather disturbing and usually make me NOT want to buy a product. The most interesting thing is how few years ago many of these were printed. Thanks for the yesteryear tour.

  51. Gregory lewis says:

    Think about it the ads today are only subtlety different. Todays ads show the woman doing every thing from dishes to cleaning of floors, dusting, carpet cleaning, windows, child care, cooking, etc. Half of which being done after she comes home from work.

  52. Rosie says:

    These are so funny! I’m totally printing the beer one to hang in my kitchen as well!

  53. Rog says:

    Hey on your quote “I’m to pretty to do my homework so my brother has to do it for me” you missed that it’s “too” not “to” – the T-shirt graphic has that right; guess someone needs a brother that’s a proofreader.

  54. Kat says:

    For those who are wondering, the woman-rug ad was for Mr. Leggs dacron-rayon blend slacks; the copy reads, “Though she was a tiger lady, our hero didn’t have to fire a shot to floor her. After one look at his Mr. Leggs slacks, she was ready to have him walk all over her. If you’d like your own doll-to-doll carpeting, hunt up a pair of these he-man, Mr. Leggs slacks.”


  55. Lisa says:

    I’d really like it if some of these were larger so I could read the text (as you suggest).

  56. liberalssarefascists says:

    Well, you know, back when women had a sense of shame and some self-respect, back when they were cleaning house and eating Total, they weren’t the fat cows they are today.

    And about the shoe ad, “Keep Her Where She Belongs. You know… naked, on the floor, kissing your feet? That’s where women belong.”

    My woman agrees with that and is quite happy down there.

  57. MakeYourOwnSammich says:

    14 fingernails? Perhaps ‘the woman belongs in the kitchen’ isn’t the only stereotype there. Either that, or she has quite a few more fingers than your average human.

    Sadly, Apple still pushes some of the stereotypes listed. After all, the iPad is supposed to be great for women, because they don’t need much from a complicated ol’ desktop computer-just something easy to use to find recipes and knitting patterns. (2010 blog post from an Apple PR guy) I’ll bet he can’t even figure out simple HTML without his handy drag and drop blog editor. Wait, nevermind, another perk you get from buying Apple? Never having to learn how to drag and drop, like on those complicated Windows and Linux OSs. Seriously?

  58. Gerald says:

    Ahh the good old days.

  59. Jen says:

    Those commenting on housecleaning not being that big of an issue, try to remember all the commercials you’ve seen of men doing housework. Mr. Clean does not count, because he just hands the stuff to the woman cleaning. I only can think of one commercial myself, where the entire family is handing off that magic eraser in the kitchen.

  60. mr lucky says:

    please, girls…
    you should feel empowered that a man designed easy-opening ketchup with you in mind to allow you 1 more service to please YOUR man!
    (beware you don’t chip a nail!)

  61. rofl says:

    How do you fix a woman’s watch?

    You don’t…there’s a clock on the oven!

  62. rj says:

    Ok. First, stop living in the past. This is a different day and time and todays male has given a supporting role to women. They are appreciative and grateful for the contribution sacrifically given by the woman of today. Secondly, the commentator on these pics needs to seriously GET A LIFE and stop the hate!! Hey, if you don’t like the man you’re with, find SOMEONE who will make you sing instead of whine like a jackass about something that happened years ago. This is a NEW DAY!!!!

  63. Cindy says:

    What is the problem with appliances as gifts?
    Personally I would like a new vacuum for Mother’s day. The one I have doesn’t work wonderfully and a working one would make my job much easier.

  64. Vicki says:

    I must have absorbed acres of these, as a big, early reader – but I only remember Mr. Lee’s shirts. Verbatim.
    “How do you get your shirts so clean, Mr. Lee?”
    “Ancient Chinese secret.”
    “My husband, some hotshot. Here’s his ancient Chinese secret….

  65. Vicki says:

    ((PS: Genuine party joke from the era of drunk Twister))
    Long story short:
    Woman buys vase at a garage sale, genie gives her a wish.
    She’s lonely, her cat loves her, so turn him into a man.
    Swooning, etc.
    Man/Cat: “Now aren’t you sorry you had me fixed?”

  66. Emily says:

    Personally, I think more of these are funny rather than “horrid” as most claim on here. There is nothing wrong with being a housewife, so please stop the negativity. I’m proud we have come as far as we have to be accepted in the ways we are now, but honestly, I do look to my husband to be the head of the household & I enjoy making our “house” a “home”. I feel that a lot of these comments about these pictures are basically stating that “It’s stupid to be a housewife” Really? C’mon now!

  67. Babs says:

    Cindy, I saw some Mother’s Day gift suggestions, including a vacuum on Lowe’s email ad that came today.

  68. Deb says:

    these ads aren’t even funny and they weren’t back then either.

    I do think it’s sad that old attitudes like this seem to be keeping some women from enjoying cooking today. I love cooking and being a stay at home mom, but that is my choice and what I dreamed of doing.

    being a homemaker is honest work that I am proud to do. It is not my whole identity and it is still a valid economic option when daycare costs are incredibly high. Men can make great homemakers, too.

  69. TINA GOLD says:

    I was born in 1948 so I was either not born yet when these adverts were out or a a baby. I still grew up in a era when pretty and dumb (which I was back then was a sure guy getter). I am glad, now that I an 63 (and still pretty but very smart) that I have a great guy who does everything for me and a house keeper (so I don’t have to break my 10 beautiful long fingernails – LOL. I wish I had the brains back then was I was young and beautiful.

  70. Jacey Squires says:

    i know that these ads are very sexist, but what i really don’t like is your reaction.

    please, most of these ads were made in the 1950′s, and the people who made the ads have probably already died. therefore you shouldn’t react to them so harshly.

  71. phyllis says:

    It’s silly to think that women (and men) aren’t still prisoners of societal expectations. The really achievement is to define yourself and choose your own path. It has always been so.

  72. Matt says:

    What are all you women doing on this comment board? Get into the kitchen and make supper! And don’t burn the beer.

  73. Sam Hill says:

    If the women today would stay at home the America would be a much better place. The only reason they go out and work is so they don’t have to take care of a husband, and so they can take care of more than one man.

  74. Roy says:

    Pretty good, except for propagating the “75 cent” myth as if it were gender related. Look into the facts and psychology. It is clear that the problem is with negotiation and satisfaction.

    Men measure success by money and are harder negotiators. Men who don’t do well at negotiation are also making less than men who do well at it.

    Reduce the whiny blame gaming and take action. Make your own way. That is independence…

  75. Mary says:

    I’m a woman and I’m not angry at men – I’m angry at WOMEN. Women have become 100% hypocrites. Look at how much money is spent just so a woman can look “hot”. Really? Hot? “Hot” is a term that denotes being receptive to intercourse. “Hot” used to be the goal of foreplay and the biggest complaint of women – that men don’t spend enough time using foreplay to get her “hot” before sex is initiated. No problem guys – we’ll wear things – think things – do things that puts our sexuality out on our sleeves so all you have to do is pluck the one you want to … well … it rhymes with pluck. Then we’ll complain when you don’t take us seriously and you’ll be punished for it. Yeah, if you notice those ads ARE directed toward the men and not the women. Women don’t want to another woman to tell her how to get a man they want to hear it from the men. So these days women dress in shoes and clothes that are impossible to move about in just so she will look “hot” for men and then complain that women of yesterday were soooooo stupid to let the men rule them.

  76. Dave says:

    Some of these ads are over the top by today’s standards, but I am more struck by the possibility that the author (Monica Bielanko) might have some serious self-esteem issues, and an axe to grind of her own. Perhaps these ads hit a little too close to home for her? For example, look at some of her comments on these ads:
    “You can take your kitchen appliances and shove it, mister.”
    “I’d love to show you my reaction if my husband rolled up on Christmas morning with a new vacuum for me.”
    “I’d love to get the dude behind this ad in a sweaty headlock. HOW DO YOU LIKE ME NOW? HUH? THAT INDELICATE ENOUGH FOR YA?”
    “I can drive a stick and my husband can’t, suckas!”
    “Yeah I can open it. WHEN I CRACK IT ON YOUR SKULL.”

    If Monica is married, then I certainly pity her husband if he has to deal with this kind of attitude.

    The ads depicted are from an age where gender discrimination was tilted in favor of men. We now live in an age where it is tilted in favor of women.
    Today’s media is just as skewed, depicting men as helpless buffoons while women save the day. Facts are irrelevant—for example, whenever you watch television today, the bad guys tend to be white while the good guys tend to be black.

    In my view, women and men have always been equal, but we have different priorities in life, and we have traditionally chosen different areas of expertise. Is that such a bad thing? It is great that women have more opportunities available to them today. We should and do celebrate that. But why must we turn it into a competition? Do we really need woman boxers and truck drivers? Is it wrong to acknowledge that, in general, certain groups of people tend to be more talented in certain areas, while other groups tend to be better at other tasks?

    Oh, and one more thing—the so-called “gender-related wage gap” is a myth perpetuated by feminists who want to have their cake (work fewer hours than their male counterparts) and eat it too (earn the same amount as those who log more hours and/or produce more than they do). In my 27 years in the workforce, I have never once seen a job that offered different wages for men than for women.

  77. Hilda Gonswallo says:

    Well, I’ll take the anti on this. So what, that’s what sold products then. Today’s ads are mostly the same, in many cases making the man the “dumb” one. How is that better?

  78. jrd says:

    I’m having difficulty deciding which comment is the most astounding, MOD’s or ssarefascists’s. Both are jaw-dropping.

  79. jrd says:

    Sam Hill: “If the women today would stay at home the America would be a much better place. The only reason they go out and work is so they don’t have to take care of a husband, and so they can take care of more than one man.”

    SH, few men do not expect their wives to work, and many men use the term “gold diggers” for women who do not financially support themselves. What would you say to those men?

  80. rgl says:

    I don’t understand what the issue is. It’s a different time and place. But now we have to sit through commercials that make the men, husbands look like idiots. Is that OK?

  81. Mike says:

    Well… Call me what you will….. I truely miss the wholesome type woman that was lost with ERA. Now women want to act like men, but expect to be treated like a lady…..That’s why Chivalry is dead!

  82. Cheryl Vandiver says:

    I think we have a long way to go and it’s our fault. How many men do you know who would wear platform shoes with 4inch heels,have their chests cut open to look sexy and other other things we do in the name of retaining our youth and looking beautiful! I wear makeup and look nice but come on !

  83. Browsing says:

    I was laughing out loud at the Hoover ad: it happened at my house when I was a kid. My Mom was P.O.! Not because my Dad EVER made her feel like her place was in the kitchen (she’s a horrible cook, and he’s a great cook, btw), or any of that. I think it was because she was always used to getting “good” gifts from my Dad. You know, like cars, coats, etc. (and we weren’t rich by any standards). He got her stuff she wanted, in other words. Honestly though, the vacuum was such an upgrade to the one we had before that MY BROTHER and I appreciated the thing more than she did. It was waaaay lighter: the previous one felt like it was made of lead.

    She still talks/fumes about it, and that was a little over 30 years ago!

    I was watching the Graham Norton show last weekend (Jon Hamm, Charlize Theron, Steve Coogan guests), and they actually showed the ‘Blow In Her Face’ ad! Then I saw this blog.

    I’m glad that we’ve taught my daughter that she can be anything she wants to be. She’s had great female role-models, none of which are the simple, lame-o type of woman that’s being pitched to in these ads. I can’t believe these ads even worked.

  84. John Rigler says:

    One of my earliest TV memories is an ad for a hair spray. A woman Dr. just worked a 16-hour shift at the hosp, but her hair still looks great!. Even at the time, I knew there was something wrong with having to be a fashion plate no matter what.

  85. ABRO says:

    Can’t see anything wrong here. Move along. Guys tell her you’re going out to smoke a cigar with some friends. After you kick over her ironong board.

  86. Hal says:

    The big thing now for liberals and attention starved media rabble rousers like the one who wrote the above article is to cry ‘sexism’ over everything.
    For the past 30+ years feminsm has been the #1 cause of divorce, gender confusion and the *ucked up state of this nations soul.

  87. Billie-bob says:

    You & your “type” are the whole cause of the US being in the state of turmoil it is in today! You don’t see NOTHING past your snotty nose. You need to blow the CRAP out of it, but BLOW HARD, cause it’s also DEEP in your head. You weren’t even a thought when these ads were used. What an IDIOT! You don’t have ANY “class”. I would DEFINATELY not call you a lady. You have some pretty bad psycological issues that really needs addressed! You look pretty on the outside, but there’s a whole lot of UGLY inside. If you are married, you MUST be venting out this hatred by using jokes. I’m only guessing, but you are probably a lezzie. Thats my observation. Now here’s my comment…Men are the stupidest, idiotic, dumbest fools when it comes to commercials (OR sitcoms) these days. USUALLY men are not even a part of a family in an ad or sitcom. Men cannot get a government job. You are encouraged to apply if you are a woman, handicapped, or minority, which means anyone but a MAN! You need to take your bra burning mentality and find a good life. Someone done you wrong somewhere, & I am truly sorry about that…WHAT YOU REALLY NEED IS JESUS! GET SAVED! HE’LL GIVE YOU A NEW HEART & A NEW LIFE! CALL ON HIM NOW!!! Romans 10:13 “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the LORD shall be saved”.

  88. Alexandria says:

    Oh come on people! Women’ lib did nothing but liberate men from their responsibilities. It was all about getting women out of the home and into the workforce by ripping up the security of the homemaker and no-fault divorce. There used to be hundreds of laws giving advantages and protections to women. Women actually lost rights because of women’ lib. Now if your husband divorces his wife, he is no longer required to provide her with a house to live in and support her and mothers no longer get custody of their children by default. Wake up girls!

  89. trade show booth design says:

    Woah this weblog is great i like studying your posts. Stay up the good paintings! You know, lots of persons are hunting round for this info, you could help them greatly.

  90. best nulled scriptz says:

    Its such as you read my mind! You seem to grasp so much approximately this, such as you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some percent to drive the message house a little bit, however instead of that, that is great blog. A great read. I will certainly be back.

  91. graphicriver templates says:

    I feel that is among the most vital information for me. And i am satisfied reading your article. But want to commentary on some common issues, The site style is wonderful, the articles is in point of fact great : D. Excellent task, cheers

  92. free music says:

    You’re in point of fact a just right webmaster. The website loading pace is incredible. It kind of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve done a excellent task in this topic!

  93. click here to look at Rock In Prevention says:

    It is actually a great and useful piece of info. I’m glad that you just shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

  94. bill says:

    Gee, all so offensive. Not like the Levi’s ad right next to them discribing how women can make their butts more shapely.

  95. Ander says:

    God why do people get bothered by this, it’s over and done with~~
    [o3o i guess i’m just one of them people who thinks one should bury the hachet]

  96. nsfw red says:

    Fantastic website. Plenty of helpful information here. I’m sending it to some pals ans also sharing in delicious. And obviously, thank you on your effort!

  97. buy fisher paykel dishwasher says:

    I’m extremely impressed together with your writing talents and also with the format on your weblog. Is that this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it is rare to peer a nice blog like this one today..

  98. Lauren says:

    Its sad how sexism is still aorund. I mean grow up already. One gender isn’t superior to the other. Women just can’t pee standing up and men can’t have kids. The end.

  99. Sam says:

    Wow. Such negative sexism. My sister, an unmarried feminist, once complained to me that there were no real men left. Real men like women. Not women trying to be men. Embrace your difference. Behind every great man there was a great woman. Men need the accolades, I guess. Great women do not.

  100. RJL says:

    Honestly, the Dr Pepper 10 is more sexist towards men than it is women. Women can drink any old soda they want, but men won’t drink from a can that doesn’t look like a bullet? It’s just as ridiculous and sexist as those Bic for Her pens.

  101. Himura Asami says:

    I hate how sexist those ads are, but I couldn’t help laughing at the sheer ridiculousness.
    Men suck.
    A generalization demeaning to the male sex?
    But after all they’ve done to us, I think they deserve it.

Ariel Sharon – A life in pictures


 The key events in the life of one of Israel’s greatest political and military leaders. Ariel Sharon 1928-2014


From general to political leader

General Sharon with then-Prime Minister Golda Meir in Sinai, Egypt. Yom Kippur War. 1973 (Photo: GPO)
General Sharon with then-Prime Minister Golda Meir in Sinai, Egypt. Yom Kippur War. 1973 (Photo: GPO)
Sharon with then-Defense Minister Moshe Dayan. West of Suez Canal. Yom Kippur War 1973. (Photo: Bamahane, Abraham Vered)
Sharon with then-Defense Minister Moshe Dayan. West of Suez Canal. Yom Kippur War 1973. (Photo: Bamahane, Abraham Vered)
Sharon with Rabin and Yekutiel Adam. 1976. (Photo: Moshe Milner, GPO)
Sharon with Rabin and Yekutiel Adam. 1976. (Photo: Moshe Milner, GPO)
Sharon appointed to defense minister. 1981 (Photo: Shalom Bar Tal)
Sharon appointed to defense minister. 1981 (Photo: Shalom Bar Tal)
Then Defense Minister Sharon with Prime Minister Begin at Bufour outpost, Lebanon (Photo: IDF)
Then Defense Minister Sharon with Prime Minister Begin at Bufour outpost, Lebanon (Photo: IDF)
Sharon with slain PM-Rabin (Photo: Defense Ministry)
Sharon with slain PM-Rabin (Photo: Defense Ministry)
Sharon on Suez Canal. 1982 (Photo: Mose Milner, GPO)
Sharon on Suez Canal. 1982 (Photo: Mose Milner, GPO)
Sharon with wife Lily at an Air Force base.1982 (Photo: Baruch Rimon, GPO)
Sharon with wife Lily at an Air Force base.1982 (Photo: Baruch Rimon, GPO)
Sharon at Knesset Plenum. 1985 (Photo: Nati Harnik, GPO)
Sharon at Knesset Plenum. 1985 (Photo: Nati Harnik, GPO)
Sharon addresses Likud. 1986 (Photo: Shalom Bar Tal)
Sharon addresses Likud. 1986 (Photo: Shalom Bar Tal)
Sharon on his farm in the northern Negev (Photo: Yossi Rot)
Sharon on his farm in the northern Negev (Photo: Yossi Rot)
Sharon on his farm (Photo: Michael Kremer)
Sharon on his farm (Photo: Michael Kremer)
Sharon with Palestinian President Abbas. 2003 (Photo: Reuters)
Sharon with Palestinian President Abbas. 2003 (Photo: Reuters)
Sharon at Hanukkah ceremony (Photo: Flash 90)
Sharon at Hanukkah ceremony (Photo: Flash 90)
Sharon addresses cabinet as PM. 2005 (Photo: AP)
Sharon addresses cabinet as PM. 2005 (Photo: AP)

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030


The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030SEXPAND

As Michael Bloomberg’s reign comes to a close, our mayor/billionaire underwriter is talking up his next move, which involves teaching other cities to be more like New York. But behind the scenes, he’s also scrambling to push through dozens of building projects that will define his legacy.

A few days ago, the mayor announced his plans to form a consulting group that will teach other cities to be more like New York, an “urban SWAT team” in the words of The New York Times, helping other municipalities achieve the same economic, health, and cultural growth that New York has seen under El Bloombito.

But behind the scenes, the outgoing administration is quietly hustling to gain approvals on a whopping $12 billion worth of building projects. It seems that Bloomberg would rather be remembered for the economic miracle he nurtured into being—and the building boom it spurred—than for nannying his constituents. After all, the NYT reminds us that 40 percent of New York City has been rezoned under Bloomberg—and this new crop of approvals and tax breaks will cement that physical legacy.

Let’s get to know some of the biggest, shall we?

Domino Sugar: 1.5 Billion

The tortured project to rebuild Williamsburg’s post-industrial waterfront as a gigantic luxury housing development is finally underway—the SHoP-designed towers span 11 acres of waterfront, and though they’ve been redesigned to be more “porous.” Many still oppose the development, but on December 11, Community Board 1 approved the project with only minor quibbles.

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030SEXPAND

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030SEXPAND

Hallets Point: $1 billion

“Halletts Point is one of the few remaining New York neighborhoods that feels like a timeless, undisturbed backwater, forgotten by the city and left to urban entropy,” writes Nathan Kensinger in this photo essay on the neighborhood. Well, not for long: This billion-dollar project—approved this fall by City Council—is going to turn a grassy park that points from Queens towards Manhattan into a complex of 2,100 luxury apartments, restaurants, shops, and a waterfront promenade.

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

St. George outlet mall and observation wheel: $580 million

Even New York isn’t safe from the race to build a bigger Ferris wheel. This plan will combine America’s two favorite things: Amusement parks and outlet malls. Nestled along the Staten Island waterfront, it calls for the construction of 125 outlet shops and the largest Ferris Wheel in the Western Hemisphere. The project was approved by City Council in November, though funding remains uncertain—construction is slated to begin in 2016.

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 20301SEXPAND

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030SEXPAND

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

Hudson Yards: $1.2 Billion

Destined to add an insane 13 million square feet of residential and commercial property to Manhattan’s market over the next ten to fifteen years, this 16-tower development is the largest the city has seen in years. Here’s a great example of a project that incoming mayor Bill de Blasio might not look so kindly upon: Last week, the city approved $120 million in tax breaksfor the developers of Hudson Yards, a practice De Blasio has said he will cut back on.

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030SEXPAND

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Hunter College: $1.7 billion

A joint project between Sloan-Kettering and Hunter, this complex will build a 1.15-million square foot tower along FDR Drive by 2018. The plan was approved in November—and according to The New York Times, it will be too late to reverse it by the time De Blasio takes office in January,

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030SEXPAND

Greenpoint Landing: $2 Billion

Here’s the big one. Perhaps the most controversial plan on the docket, this mega-developmentreceived the go-ahead from City Council last week. The development will transform the sleepy Greenpoint waterfront with ten glassy residential towers, adding 5,500 units to the neighborhood.

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

Willets Point: $3 Billion

Another example of a project that would come under fire from De Blasio. Though locals argue their neighborhood isn’t as blighted as the city claims it is, this 62-acre development—including 2,490 units of housing, a shopping center and an entrainment complex—was approved by City Council October. Last week, the city approved a $43 million tax break for its developers.

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

The Billion-Dollar Megaprojects That Will Transform NYC By 2030

Bloomberg might be sneaking these projects into the world like a teenager tiptoeing through the backdoor after curfew, but that’s not to say that De Blasio is anti-development. As Gothamistpoints out, he received thousands of dollars of campaign donations from the very developers mentioned in this article. He’s more likely to be a “development pragmatist,” in the words ofCapital NY, driving harder bargains but not giving developers the complete (and very tall) cold shoulder.

Whether he’ll continue or simply amend Bloomberg’s party line? We’ll have to wait for 2014 to see.

1Author is participating@

InterceptingJensenUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



I’m all for transforming NYC, but at what expense? The way things are going, a lot of people will be priced out of NYC.12/19/13 2:31pm




A LOT of people already have been these past 12 years… Manhattan is quickly becoming an exclusive playground for the super-rich. 12/19/13 2:39pm

104 participants@

lollipopKABOOMUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



Forgive me for my ignorance, I have only visited NYC once as a child, but are there any non-rich people living in this city anymore? I can hardly believe that these glass towers and fancy restorations are accessible to people making less than 100k a year. So where are those making your sandwiches, sweeping your streets, and serving your street meat living if the entirety of the city is being gentrified into oblivion? Are they all commuting from an hour outside the city? Are they all traveling from Connecticut, New Jersey, etc? 12/19/13 2:37pm




Oh there are non-rich people in the city but it takes groups of 3-4 individuals to squeeze into one $3000 a month small ass apt to afford to live here. 12/19/13 2:40pm




“are there any non-rich people living in this city anymore?”

in manhatten, below 110th street… no.

in the rest of the 5 boroughs, which is the majority of new york… yes. 12/19/13 2:42pm

1Author is participating@

NerdtasticUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



I think google earth and NYC should combine to do a “Future Earth”. If all of the officially proposed concepts (real projects, even if they aren’t funded) are completed what would the 5 boroughs look like in 25 years. 3D models you can fly in and around and see street level views. It couldn’t be too hard for the city planning board to require a 3D model submitted with any planning submission for projects over $50M or 10 stories. It could be a tool for neighborhood meetings and zoning decisions and just plain cool for the rest of us. 12/19/13 2:35pm

18 participants@

Lana, Lana,…LANAAAAAA!!!UKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



My economics training tells me that all this new residential and commercial space will help drive down the price of renting in NYC.

My real-life training tells me that this will not happen. 12/19/13 2:51pm

SamIAm89ULana, Lana,…LANAAAAAA!!!



Yeaaaaah, you’d think that but I’m sure there’s such a demand for housing in the city that there’s really no way to actually get the supply to meet the demand and affect the pricing. Something something inelastic prices something something. 12/19/13 3:08pm

SwifterrULana, Lana,…LANAAAAAA!!!



Your economic training is really poor. This isn’t some theory defying mysticism.12/19/13 3:15pm

8 participants@

JimmyMcNultyUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



A joint project between Sloan-Kettering and Hunter

Sigh. Meanwhile, Hunter and the rest of the City University system continue to raise tuition and move further and further away from their roots as free universities accessible to all New Yorkers… Pathetic. Disgusting. 12/19/13 2:37pm




I have to say, as a current Hunter student, I’m excited for the new building. Do you know how unbelievably crowded the Hunter campus is? How few resources we have? It’s exciting that we’re going to have access to new spaces and classes and opportunities. This will eventually be enormously beneficial for the Hunter community. 12/19/13 2:59pm




It’s sort of how all universities are going, though. All about the money and prestige. Tuition is always going to go up =/12/19/13 3:06pm

6 participants@
2 participants@
1 participant@

SmorgasborgUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



The Hudson Yards project is actually pretty cool. It will integrate improvements to the High Line walkway with accessible public spaces. The skyscrapers themselves will also look quite lovely, in my opinion.

Here’s a picture of one of the planned “sky garden” parks that will be built atop the High Line next to the development:

I am following this development closely and I think it will be very good for New York City as a whole. It’s not like other developments that are completely changing existing neighborhoods: they’re building basically everything on top of an old rail yard. 12/19/13 2:29pm

3 participants@
3 participants@

CaptainJackUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



Earlier this year Mayor Bloomberg said this

“As bad as Sandy was, future storms could be even worse,” he said. “In fact, because of rising temperatures and sea levels, even a storm that’s not as large as Sandy could – down the road – be even more destructive.”

For a dude who believes catastrophic events around sea level are going to become more common over the years he sure is encouraging a whole lot of buildings at water level. 12/19/13 3:20pm




When you build it, the investors make money. When they get knocked down and rebuilt, the investors make money.12/19/13 3:54pm

1 participant@
3 participants@

JimmyMcNultyUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



which involves teaching other cities to be more like New York

Ah, so these other cities are gonna price poor/working people out, privatize all their schools, and have their police forces randomly stop and search innocent men of color on the street? Awesome! Thanks Bloombito! 12/19/13 2:36pm

1 participant@

MaWeiTaoUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



Most people living in any of NYC’s hotspots are foolishly obsessed with the lifestyle or the disgustingly wealthy. Oddly, the city has acquired a reputation as a tech center. But from what I’ve seen it’s mostly a bunch of rich investors keen on the prestige of having a New York address. Everyone I know who works in the city commutes in.

Prior to the economic downturn in 2008 I was noticing quite a lot of New Yorkers moving to Connecticut. If your work force has to travel 1 to 2 hours every day what’s the point of dumping a fortune on being located in the city? This, along with De Blasio’s promises, will likely result in a repeat of the 80s when there was a mass exodus of companies. It certainly would be a boon for Connecticut and New Jersey. 12/19/13 5:32pm

3 participants@




Sadly, that’s not the developer’s problem, so they won’t address it. To analogize, it’s like the financial crisis: companies (mortgage brokers=developers in this case) have an incentive to package incomplete, inexpensive products (sub-prime Mortgage-backed securities=low-lying coastal real estate developments) that are essentially time bombs. These time bombs will only explode well after they are off of the originators’ books. It is up to the consumer (banks=real estate companies or alternatively public advocates in the case of privately owned residential developments) to address these issues. In the case of the financial crisis, the banks repackaged the toxic assets and resold them to entities with even less foresight and institutional knowledge. I think that will be the ultimate result here.

“On the planning side there are multiple options for adaptation to sea level rise. The first is protection, which is what everybody calls the first line, which usually turns out only to be over the short to mid-term, that is 10 to maybe 100 year time scales. But if we want to have New York City around more than 500 years, that means we have to think about what the conditions will be 500 years from now. We need to think about how it is laid out in terms of the waterfront and elevation. Is it really built in a way that is sustainable? I would say absolutely not.”

– Professor Klaus Jacob, Columbia University, Seismology Geology and Tectonophysics 12/19/13 3:19pm




This was my first thought. All of these don’t appear to have any planning for expected rises in water. A recent NatGeo article expects, at a conservative thought, ocean rises between 2 and 3 feet in New York by 2100. This is considering increased air temperature, increased water temperature, and a warming, shifting Gulf stream and Atlantic current. All these proposed structures appear to be right on the water. Might be time to start thinking about such things… 12/19/13 3:33pm

1 participant@

DeltaOmegaUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



Right, because Sharknado 2 needs an excuse to place another CG ferris wheel in the middle of New York.

12/19/13 10:57pm


hippie94UKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



I’m a huge fan of both model and life-size railroads, I can’t wait for the entrainment complex in Willets Point to be done 🙂12/19/13 2:48pm


SGTalonUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



How about a Before and After picture of these areas? That would be awesome.

I am completely unfamiliar with any of these places as I have only briefly been through NYC on my way to NJ.12/19/13 3:24pm

1 participant@

Farquest de JamalUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



Kelsey, interesting article.

BTW, although ‘entrainment’ is a real word, I think ‘entertainment’ is the one you are looking for. 12/19/13 3:48pm

2 participants@

lmpUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



But, it’s so far from the views you really want to see… 12/19/13 2:55pm


Nick JohnsonUKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



“…teach other cities to be more like New York…”

Hmmm… not really sure I’d want that.12/19/13 3:56pm

1 participant@

Core.2UKelsey Campbell-Dollaghan



Hudson Yards looks like 3 huge light refracting tiki’s to me. 12/19/13 2:56pm

1 participant@
95 additional replies submitted and awaiting review

Submitted discussions can be approved by the author or users followed by this blog.